Shawan Jabarin, General Director of the Palestinian human rights organization Al-Haq has had an ongoing travel ban placed on him by the Israeli authorities.
The
Alternative Information Center (AIC) demands that the Israeli authorities allow
Shawan Jabarin, a leading human rights activist and General Director of the
Palestinian human rights organization Al-Haq (www.alhaq.org), to travel outside
the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), and to unconditionally and
immediately rescind the travel ban currently in place against him.
Jabarin,
a long-time human rights activist, has not been permitted to leave the OPT
since March 2006. Israel maintains that “security reasons” preclude Jabarin
from leaving the West Bank, although Jabarin has not been charged with any
offence and no information about the “security reasons” has been provided to
Jabarin or his legal team, making it impossible to legally challenge this ban.
For
over two decades, Jabarin has acted to protect and promote the human rights of
the Palestinian people. He began as a fieldworker in the southern West Bank for
Al-Haq, later acquiring an MA in human rights from Galway University in Ireland
before becoming the General Director of Al-Haq. Jabarin is also a veteran
activist for a just peace and joint Palestinian-Israeli-international struggle
for an end to the occupation in accordance with international law. Jabarin,
like thousands of other Palestinians, was on several occasions placed in
administrative detention—without charges or trial—by the Israeli authorities.
Jabarin
has petitioned the Israeli High Court to lift the travel ban, and a hearing on
this is scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday, 3 July. To date the High Court has
rejected two previous petitions in 2006 and 2007 in this matter.
Results of the massive Israeli bombing of Gaza City in July 2002 in which 15 Palestinians were killed.
Six Palestinian survivors and
relatives of the victims of a massive Israeli bombing of GazaCity in July 2002 have submitted a
lawsuit in Spain
against top Israeli military officials to determine their liability in this
incident. The lawsuit, initiated and prepared by the Palestinian
Center for Human Rights, represents the first time that Palestinian
survivors of Israeli
military attacks have directly petitioned the Audiencia Nacional, the Spanish National Court
that deals with special crimes.
The lawsuit requests
that the Audiencia Nacional investigate whether the 22 July 2002 incident, in
which the Israeli air force dropped a one tonne bomb on the Al Daraj
neighbourhood of GazaCity in order to demolish
the home of suspected Hamas commander Salah Shehadeh, can be considered a crime
against people and goods protected during armed conflict. During this incident,
15 Palestinians were killed, mostly infants and children, while150 others were
injured.
If the court finds this
to be the case, the Israeli military officials could be prosecuted in Spain due to
the peninsula’s universal jurisdiction for crimes against humanity.
The military officials
named in the petition: former Israeli Minister of Defence Benjamin Ben Eliezer;
Military Secretary Michael Herzog;; former Chief of Staff Moshe Yaalon; former
Commander of the Israeli Air Force Dan Halutz; General Doron Almog; former
President of the National Security Council Gioria Eiland; and former General
Director of the General Security Services (GSS) Abraham Dichter.
The United Nations, the
European Union, the United States
and Britain criticized Israel at the
time for this “heavy handed” action that “does not contribute to peace,” as the
US White House spokesperson noted in its statement. An estimated 100,000
Palestinians attended the funerals of the 15 victims.
Despite the Israeli High Court decision on 6 September 1999, outlawing the use of arbitrary torture as an interrogation method, methods of torture are still applied by Israeli interrogators of Palestinian detainees (photo by TRC).
The United Nations International Day in Support of Victims of
Torture (26 June) is an occasion when human rights organizations, torture
survivors and concerned individuals raise public awareness of the continued
prevalence of torture around the world and discuss methods of eradicating this
evil. This year, the Treatment and Rehabilitation Center for Victims of Torture
(TRC) and United against Torture (UAT) organized a conference in Ramallah titled
“Monitoring Human Rights Compliance in Places of Detention.” This series of
lectures by national and international organizations and experts examined torture
in Palestine and Israel, and discussed the best practices for prevention. Dr.
Mahmud Sehwail, General Director and Consultant Psychiatrist at the TRC stressed
the importance of this day when he said it is an opportunity to support victims
of torture, remember those who are suffering, and show international concern to
eradicate this crime.
According to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), of which Israel is a
signatory, torture is defined as “any act by which severe pain or suffering,
whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such
purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession,
punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of
having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any
reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is
inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a
public official or other person acting in an official capacity” (Article 1). The
International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT) summarizes this
definition as “the intentional infliction of severe mental or physical pain or
suffering by or with the consent of the state authorities for a specific
purpose.”
Unfortunately, torture is used as a routine method of interrogation
and punishment in more than half of the world’s countries, including Israel,
despite being prohibited by international human rights and humanitarian law.
The TRC defines torture as “the purposeful and systematic annihilation of a
human being’s physical and psychological well-being.” This sentiment is echoed
by Palestinians who have survived torture at the hands of Israeli security
forces.
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana in Berlin on Tuesday, 24 June.
The international community pledged US$242 million
yesterday (24 June) to strengthen the Palestinian Authority’s police and legal
systems. The pledges, made at the German-initiated Berlin Conference in Support of Palestinian Civil
Security and the Rule of Law, will be channeled
to the Palestinian Authority (PA) over the next three years to finance
development of the Palestinian security and judicial systems in the West Bank. These
funds, part of the US$ 7.4 billion pledged by the international community for
the PA at the 17 December 2007 International Donors’ Conference for the
Palestinian State in Paris, will also finance an expansion of the European
Union Police Mission in the Palestinian Territories.
The one-day Berlin conference, touted as “a clear signal
of support” by German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier and others for
the building of a Palestinian state, was premised on the idea that
strengthening the civilian security infrastructure of the PA is essential to
the creation of a Palestinian state. As the German Foreign Ministry noted in a
press release, “The Federal Government knew from the outset
that it was key to bolster the Palestinian people's will for peace by
strengthening the Palestinian economy. And there can be no economic development
without functioning state structures as well as legal certainty for investors.”
While Israel allowed dozens of trucks to deliver basic goods to the Gaza Strip on 22 June, following implementatoin of the Hamas/Israel ceasefire agreement the situation for the Gaza population is still precarious.
The
Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire in Gaza, which took effect at 6am on 19
June, is designed to last for six months. According to the terms of
this agreement, Hamas
and other Palestinian political factions are to immediately halt their
attacks on Israel, and Israel is to cease its military raids on the
Gaza Strip.
During
the first stage of implementation, Israel is required to ease its
blockade of the Gaza Strip and allow resumption of some supply
shipments. A week later, Israel is to loosen restrictions at cargo
crossings. During the final stage of implementation, the sides are
expected to discuss the opening of a major border passage between Gaza
and Egypt, in addition to the release of an Israeli soldier, GiladShalit, whom Hamas has held prisoner for two years.
In Israel, public controversy exists around the fact that Shalit’srelease will be discussed only during the final stage of the ceasefire
implementation, which further includes the opening of the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt. For its side, Hamas has conditioned the release of Shalit on the freeing of 450 Palestinian prisoners, of whom Israel has so far stated that it is prepared to release only 70.
However, Hamasis in a no-lose situation when it demands the release of its more
active cadre, i.e. activists the movement never expected Israel would
release anyway. It would be a major victory for the movement if Israel
releases even a portion of these prisoners. Otherwise, Hamas may arrive at an independent agreement with Egypt regarding the Rafah crossing, an agreement that would not involve Israel, and GiladShalit would remain in Palestinian hands indefinitely.