Destruction in the Gaza Strip (AIC archive photo).
While the
Israeli government reiterates that it is committed to a genuine peace process
with the Palestinians, and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert cautioned the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on 14 January against
large scale operations in the Gaza Strip, saying he “strongly recommends not
becoming embroiled in operations and costs that bear no proportion to the
constraints that we face,” the situation on the ground tells a different story.
The Israeli
military raid into the Gaza Strip on 15 January, in which 19 Palestinians were
killed and dozens wounded, was the bloodiest single day of violence since the
August 2005 disengagement. This brings the year’s toll in the number of
Palestinian deaths caused by Israel—and
it should be emphasized that we are only two weeks into 2008—up to nearly 60.
In
retaliation for the Israeli raid into Gaza, a Palestinian sniper shot and
killed an Ecuadorian volunteer at Kibbutz Ein Hashlosha on the border of the Gaza
Strip, and a barrage of at least 70 Kassam rockets, mortar
rounds, and a Katyusha rocket
hit in the vicinity of Sderot and Ashkelon in the following days.
In a
hallucinatory attempt to reverse the flow of time and logic, Israeli Ambassador
to the United Nations, Danny Carmon, wrote a letter of complaint to the UN,
calling on the United Nations to condemn the sniper attack and Kassam rocket
barrage, while framing Israel’s
actions as purely defensive. The Israeli ambassador has been submitting
complaints such as these in the recent past each time that there is any form of
strike into Israel, to lay the justificatory grounds for the possibility of a
wide-scale Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip.
This
pattern repeated itself on 16 January, when the Israeli Air Force killed an
additional three civilians in Gaza,
including 14-year-old Amir Yazji, during an
assassination attempt on a nearby vehicle. Israeli warplanes killed two more Palestinians in a missile attack on 17 January. And once more,
defending Israeli civilians was used as a pretext for an offensive against
Palestinian targets, resulting in the death and wounding of Palestinian
civilians.
Israeli
military Chief of Staff, Gabi Ashkenazi, stated on 15 January that these
Israeli attacks will continue and could potentially be enlarged in the near
future.
In order to
get a good gauge of where this situation is leading we must be clear about a
few factors.
First we
must get an accurate picture of Israel’s
existing political and military policies against the Palestinians and not fall
into the trap of focusing on these “small scale incursions” as individual
events. Instead, we must widen the lens and see them as merely individuations
of a large-scale campaign of increasing division amongst the Palestinians as a
whole and the collective punishment of 1.5 million Palestinians in the
Gaza Strip specifically. The victims don’t only include those directly hit
during Israeli military operations, but also all the detrimental results
of the ongoing economic strangulation of the Gaza Strip. Business in Gaza has come to a halt, with hundreds of businesses going bankrupt, thousands have lost their jobs and hundreds of
millions worth of projects have been frozen. A survey conducted in
May 2007 found that 70% of households in the Gaza Strip live under the
international poverty line, 42% of
households lived in extreme poverty.[i]
And things have only gotten worse since May.
According
to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA),
Special Focus report on Gaza, published in December 2007,
the humanitarian situation in Gaza
is reaching critical levels. Dependency on food assistance is at an all-time
peak, fuel shortage has resulted in
problems with the water supply and with essential services, and hospitals are short
on life-saving medicines.[ii]
While those
in power in Israel may be more interested in an attritional strategy against
the Palestinians—which safeguards the soldiers from getting bogged down in
house to house and alleyway fighting, and limits the per-incident Palestinian
body count to media acceptable levels—and be attempting to limit a severe
escalation from occurring, the situation cannot hold forever. There
is a growing level of hubris among the military and political echelon in Israel and the fact that this increase in
military actions occurs so soon after the visit of US President Bush implies
that they received approval for their strategy from the US
administration. Touting a lower number of Israeli casualties in the past year and
professing that this is a success of their ongoing military and security
policies, the Israeli authorities now believe that what was effective at one
dose will even be more effective at a higher dose. This is an untenable
supposition, stemming from a willful blindness to the volatile dynamics of the
situation on the ground: An increasingly minority government in Israel with a
very low level of popular support; a vacuous negotiations process with a
self-imposed Palestinian government that has even less popular support than
it’s Israeli counterpart; and a divided Palestinian population under dire
economic, social, and economic straits.
Though
it is difficult to predict when we will have reached a point of no return, it
is safe to say that we are rushing headlong towards the tipping point.
[ii] OCHA, The Closure of the Gaza
Strip: The Economic and Humanitarian Consequences, December 2007.
|