US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met in Jerusalem on 30 March with Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak and Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad
Barak, Rice and Fayyad
met. This is how a Palestinian joke would begin these days. Unfortunately, this
week, it was a real story. The joke, however, remains. Even a superficial
examination of the results of the highly publicized meeting highlights the
glaring gaps and the serious problematic that arises.
The statements by the US
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice—who is visiting the region this week—and
the State Department stressed the importance of what they referred to as “quality
of life and the security of ordinary people on both sides,” as a step in implementing
the Roadmap. These steps include, primarily, the removal of roadblocks,
improvements in checkpoint infrastructures, redeployment of Palestinian
Authority security forces and expansion of their responsibilities and steps to
promote economic developments.
Most Palestinians feel
cynical about these statements. Past experience proves that despite repeated
statements by the Israeli government about “improvements in life quality” or “loosening
restrictions” on checkpoints, reality on the ground hardly changes and, if
anything, everyday life has taken a turn for the worst. There is no reason to
believe that things will be different this time.
Moreover, even if these
pledges were to be fully implemented, they barely scratch the surface of the
moves necessary to make a genuine difference, and are far from dealing with the
real issues needed to achieve a just peace. How significant can the removal of
50 roadblocks be when there exist 539 illegal roadblocks dissecting the West Bank (OCHAoPT report, 11.7.07) and hindering
movement between Palestinian towns and villages? And what about the complete
siege of the Gaza Strip? The continuing construction of the Apartheid Wall on
Palestinian lands? The ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements? Despite past Israeli
commitments, new construction projects have been repeatedly authorized in the
Palestinian territories, in addition to expansion of the existing 161
settlements and 96 outposts throughout the West Bank.
These settlements, illegal under international law, not only take over
Palestinian land and resources, but render unviable any future Palestinian
state or economy. The pledges coming out
of this latest meeting almost completely ignore such critical issues.
The responsibilities
and equipment being pledged for Palestinian security forces also have a limited
effect in improving the quality of life for ordinary Palestinians. These moves fail to guarantee the security of
Palestinians, as Israel
still de-facto maintains control over all Palestinian areas. One hundred and
sixty-four Palestinian were killed and nearly 500 injured since the beginning
of 2008. The recent meeting and pledges fail to offer any guarantees to end
Israeli attacks on Palestinian areas, and Palestinian security forces are there
only to further implement Israeli security policies.
The economic moves
promised also fall short of improving the life of ordinary Palestinians. These
include advancing the establishment of two industrial zones and increasing the
number of laborers allowed to work in Israel
by 5,000, in addition to easing restrictions on the movement of businessmen and
enabling an economic conference to be held in Bethlehem in May. These moves fail to address
some of the major issues hindering the development of Palestinian economy,
namely the absolute Israeli control of Palestinian resources and over the
movement of people and merchandise within Palestinian territories and between
them and the outside world.
Most importantly, however,
this meeting failed to address the core issues in the negotiations: borders, Jerusalem, refugees,
settlements and water. These issues, of central importance to the achievement
of a just peace for Palestinians and Israelis, are being postponed in order to
weaken Palestinian demands. By failing to implement a freezing of settlements, as
demanded by the Road Map which is ostensibly the basis of the Annapolis
process, Israel
is encouraged to continue encroaching on Palestinian rights. By establishing
facts on the ground, Israel
seeks to impose a situation in which Palestinians will be pushed to agree, once
again, to a far from satisfactory agreement during the final status
negotiations.
|