According to new findings,
testimonies and hospital records, deadly blast at Gaza beach, which killed
Ghalia family members, occurred at time of shelling, not after; British
Guardian , Independent newspapers publish findings casting doubt on Israel's
claims.
The battle of versions over what happened
at the Gaza beach last weekend continued Saturday, even after the Israel
Defense Forces published its investigation report which
determined that the Israeli army was not involved in the death of seven members
of the Ghalia family.
The British Guardian and Independent newspapers on Saturday
published independent investigations which cast a doubt on the IDF's version.
According to the reporters, the key point is the army's claim that the shelling
of the area was halted nine minutes before the seven family members were
killed.
This claim is not in line with testimonies
given by survivors and medical personnel who attended to the injured.
Blast occurred during shelling
IDF officials said that the army shelled
the area between 4:30 p.m. and 4:48 p.m., while the deadly blast occurred between 4:57 p.m. and 5:10 p.m. However, according to hospital records and
testimonies given by doctors and ambulance crews and obtained by the two
newspapers, the blast which killed the Ghalia family members took place earlier
than the army reported, while the shelling was still underway.
Several of the injured had also said that
the deadly blast occurred after two or three similar explosions, apparently
caused by artillery shells which landed on the beach earlier.
The independent summarized the different
versions:
The IDF's version:
4:48 p.m.: Last shell fired at the area
4:54-4:57: Normal activity on the beach
5:12: Palestinians ask Israel to stop shelling due to injuries
5:15: First ambulance arrives at the beach
The Palestinian version:
4:45-4:46: Palestinian paramedic Khaled Abu Sada telephone confirmation of
an emergency
4:50: Abu Sada drives to the beach
5:00: The ambulance arrives at the beach
5:05: First injured arrive at the hospital in the first ambulance
Hani Asania took his two daughters to their
car while the Ghalia family was waiting for a taxi on the beach.
"There was an explosion, maybe 500
meters (1,640.5 feet) away. Then there was a second, much closer, about two
minutes later. People were running from the beach," he recounted.
"Maybe two minutes later there was a third shell. I could feel the
pressure of the blast on my face it was so strong. I saw pieces of
people."
'Shell landed closer to the girls'
Annan Ghalia, Huda Ghalia's uncle, said:
"We were sitting on the sand waiting for the taxis, the men on one side
and the women on the other. The shell landed closer to the girls. I was
screaming for people to help us. No one was coming. After about two minutes I
called the ambulance."
The first ambulance took children to the
Kamal Odwan hospital. According to its registration records, five children were
already hospitalized at 5:05 p.m. (10 minutes after the time the IDF claims
the first ambulance arrived at the hospital.) The hospital's records show that
the first blood tests were taken from the victims at 5:12 p.m.
The distance from the beach to the
hospital is approximately 6 kilometers (about 3.7 miles), and the drive through
Beit Lahiya's streets should have taken at least five minutes.
Dr Bassam al-Masri, who treated the
first wounded at the hospital, estimated that allowing for a round trip of at
least 10 minutes and time to load them, the ambulance would have left the
hospital no later than 4:50 p.m., just two minutes after the shelling stopped,
according to the IDF's report.
Dr Ahmed Mouhana, an anesthetist,
said that he was woken by a call from a fellow doctor calling him to the
hospital.
"I looked at the time. That's
what you do when someone wakes you up. It was 4:55 p.m. It only takes 10 minutes from my house, so
I was there by 5:10 p.m. or 5:15 p.m. at the latest. I went to reception and they had already done
triage on the children," he said.
Ambulance driver: I flew to the hospital
Another testimony which backs this
version was provided by ambulance driver Khaled Abu Sada, who said he received
a telephone confirmation of an emergency at 4:45 p.m. or 4:46 p.m., set off at
4:50 p.m., arrived at the scene at around 5 p.m. and returned to the hospital
after picking up one dead child and three women, two of close to death, at 5:10
p.m.
Abu Sada estimated that the round trip,
including picking up the dead and the wounded and driving to the hospital, took
him about 20 minutes. He added that he had reached speeds of up to 130kph
(80mph).
"I flew," he said.
The Independent, however, noted that the
Kamal Odwan hospital's time registration records are not accurate. Both the
Guardian and the Independent present the version of Marc Galasco, a former
Pentagon battlefield expert investigating for Human Rights Watch, who claimed last week that "all
the evidence" pointed to the deaths being caused by a 155mm land-based
artillery shell.
"You have the crater size, the shrapnel, the
types of injuries, their location on the bodies. That all points to a shell
dropping from the sky, not explosives under the sand," he said. "I've
been to hospital and seen the injuries. The doctors say they are primarily to
the head and torso. That is consistent with a shell exploding above the ground,
not a mine under it."
|