This portion of the Segregation Wall near the Palestinian village of al-Aqaba in the Israeli occupied northern Jordan Valley separates land from the farmers, and cuts off the village from easy access to closeby water supplies.
“If our access to our water is taken away,
our hope for the future is taken
too.”
Navajo
Nation Chairman Peterson Zah
Unfortunately,
this historical Navajo quote has not lost its significance in contemporary
times, when one bears in mind water issues in Palestine. These days, Israel
uses 85 percent of groundwater resources available in the West Bank, excluding
Palestinians from their use. This confiscation and control over Palestinian
water resources already started before 1967 and has continued to cause severe
damage on different levels ever since:
I.On an individual level: Israel’s control and disproportionate allocation of
water causes a lack of adequate drinking water, a basic human right. According
to the Center for Economic and Social Rights, some 26 percent of West Bank
households are left without any piped water at all. On top of that, irregular
water supply and water distribution network losses constitute extra problems
for satisfactory provision of drinking water.
II. On the community level: (community is defined here as the aggregation of
individual households and local industrial components) Separation from water
resources and destruction of water infrastructure by the Israeli military have
deeply affected villages’ economic and agricultural structure.
III. On “national” political level: The unequal distribution of water is amongst the core
issues complicating negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians. Together
with the Right of Return, the prisoners issue and the status of Jerusalem,
water negotiations have proven to be a serious stumbling block on the way
towards a long term and equitable settlement.
This
article aims at illustrating the profound impact of Israeli water policies on
Palestinian communities. It tries to offer a perspective on how agriculture,
local economy, politics and socio-cultural life are damaged in the northern
Jordan Valley. The northern Jordan Valley is extremely important in this
perspective not only for its significant contribution to the total Palestinian
agriculture, but also for demographic reasons; there are 40.000 Palestinians
living in the Valley.
The Constraints
on Agriculture
Broadly
speaking, the constraints on Palestinian agriculture take three different
forms, namely the availability of land, availability of water and access to
markets. Even though this article focuses on the availability of water, it is
of great importance to keep the issues of land and markets in mind, since it is
the interaction of these three factors that has caused Palestinian agriculture
to drop significantly. According to UNCTAD, the percentage of agricultural
contribution to the overall GDP in the West Bank fell from 37.4-53.5 percent to
18.5-25.4 percent between 1968/1970 and 1983/1985.
Land: Since
1967, the Israeli regime of occupation
has confiscated a large amount of fertile agricultural land. UNCTAD findings
show that the average of actual cultivated land in the West Bank has been
reduced by 30 percent between 1965 and 1994. Another study (Agricultural
Department of the West Bank) indicates a setback in agricultural land from 85,000 hectares in
1966 to some 46,000 in
1994. The construction of the Segregation Wall plays an important role in this
regard, separating land from their farmers and occupying large slots of land.
Unlike most foreigners are lead to believe, it is an illusion that the Wall is built
on the 1967 border. The Segregation Wall is constructed so as to include as
much (fertile) land as possible, and to exclude as many Palestinians as
possible.
Export:In 1967, the West Bank exported 80 percent of
the entire vegetable crop it produced and some 45 percent of total fruit
production. Nowadays, export has become semi-impossible. The Israeli
Authorities control not only export out of the West Bank, but also transport
inside the West Bank. More than 600 Israeli military checkpoints and road
blocks throughout the West Bank severely hinder the movement of agricultural
products. It has happened on regular base that trucks were stopped for several
hours for “interrogation,” causing the content of the truck, exposed to sun and
high temperatures, to rot.
Water: With regards to Israeli water policy, it is of crucial
importance to take the settlements into account. These concentrations of Jewish
settlers in the occupied Palestinian territory are designed to “judaize Jewish
Land.” Not only do these settlements affect ordinary Palestinian day-to-day
life, by, amongst others, mental and physical harassment, they play a key role
in understanding the depth of the water issues. In general, an Israeli has a
total water consumption of some 1959 cubic meters
per year compared to an average Palestinian use of only 238 cubic meters per year.
The difference between Palestinians and Jewish settlers is even more striking:
settlers use up some 600 liters of water each day whereas Palestinians do not
even meet the minimum daily standard of 100 liters as defined by the World
Health Organization.
The Valley
The
Jordan Valley is often referred to as the “Vegetable basket” of Palestine, a
name well-earned since the Valley contribute over 43 percent to the total
irrigated agriculture in the West Bank. Among the villages of the Valley, al-Aqaba
is one of the most famous.
This
village, surrounded by military training bases, has been under military
occupation since 1967, causing the population to be set back from 1000 to 300
inhabitants today. Agriculture, of key importance to the villagers, is severely
hindered by Israeli authorities and their water policies. In the entire
village, there is no regular pipe network and every official request of the
municipality to get permission for the construction of one, has been declined
on several occasions. The only available water has to be purchased at Israeli
military camps at very expensive prices.
Unfortunately,
the situation in al-Aqaba is not the exception, rather the rule.
Abu
Saqir, Local Council Member of the Hudaidiyya village, states that all water
has to be brought in by tanks from the ‘Ainel-Baida spring 45 km
away. Transportation costs for one tank, that can only carry three cubic meters
of water, are above 110 shekels (US$31.70), which mounts up the price of water
in an extreme way. In comparison, the general cost of one cubic meter of water
is four shekels (US$1.15) only.
Moreover,
to get to the village, the water tanks are forced to use settlement roads on
which they are subjected to Israeli police, often giving out fines. For
instance, in August 2007, the Israeli police stopped four tractors for one
month and forced each one to pay a 4,000 shekel (US$1,153) fine.
All
these transport-related troubles could be overcome; there are water wells closer
by, one of them only 200 meters away. Unfortunately, all of them are under
Israeli control.
The
contrast with the neighboring settlements could not possibly be any more striking.
As Abu Saqir puts it: “There are a lot of agricultural settlements in this
area, some of them very close to us, such as R'oi and Bqa'ot, and all the
time, their water is running.”