US Secretary of State Rice is working alone within the American administration to push the Israeli-Palestinian political negotiations forward.
Last November, U.S. President
George W. Bush made his case before the representatives of over forty countries
gathered in Annapolis, Maryland, for resolving all outstanding
issues in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and establishing a Palestinian state. He proclaimed before a skeptical audience
that remembered the failures of Camp David in
2000 and his own administration’s stillborn Road Map for Peace in 2003, “The
time is right. The cause is just.” He gave a personal pledge “to devote my effort
during my time as President to do all I can to help you achieve this ambitious
goal [of reaching a peace agreement by the end of 2008].” With less than five months left, it now seems
that everyone, including his own advisers, expect him to fail.
Israeli Foreign
Minister Tzipi Livni and chief Palestinian negotiator Ahmed Qurei have been
meeting regularly for several months, with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice joining occasionally, to discuss the so-called “final status” issues: Israel’s borders, the fate of the Palestinian
refugees, and sovereignty over Jerusalem
and its holy sites. All three sides have
used the secrecy surrounding the contents of the meetings to suggest that
significant progress is being made towards an agreement. Recent events suggest otherwise. As the Forward’s Nathan Guttman put it, “The
skepticism is palpable, however, among American, Israeli and Palestinian
officials alike.”
Two days before he
announced his intention to resign in September amid a corruption investigation that
could end in his indictment, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert broke from the
consensus on working for a comprehensive settlement last week. Any agreement that includes the issue of Jerusalem, he said, is
off the table for this year. An Israeli
spokesman reiterated that while an agreement on all other issues could probably
still be reached by the end of the year, negotiations on Jerusalem should wait for 2009.
In response, senior Palestinian
negotiator Saeb Erekat said in a press conference, “either everything will be
agreed or nothing will be agreed.” While
he did not rule out a deal by the end of the year, Erekat expressed discomfort
with the U.S.-imposed timetable. “I
don't think that time should be a sword over our necks,” he said. Another Palestinian Authority official,
however, was less circumspect, telling the Jerusalem Post that there was “zero”
chance of a deal this year because of Olmert’s resignation.
At the Annapolis conference, the U.S. assumed sole responsibility
for monitoring Israeli and Palestinian compliance with their Phase I commitments
under the Road Map, while the parties agreed to move forward in parallel on
Phase III negotiations. The Road Map
obligates Israel,
among other things, to freeze “all settlement activity (including natural
growth of settlements)” and to dismantle settlement outposts erected since
March 2001. Despite objections from Rice, Israel
has continued building in Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel even recently reneged on a 2007 deal with
the U.S. to not build in the
Jordan Valley settlement of Maskiot,
authorizing the construction of twenty new homes there.
“We want peace and agreement,”
said Erekat in a recent interview, “but the one who wants agreement should
force the Israeli Government to halt its settlement activities, end the
blockade and closures, and stop imposing facts on the ground.” When President Mahmoud Abbas expressed
Palestinian opposition to continued Israeli settlement expansion in a meeting
with President Bush earlier this year, Bush reportedly said that he was
focusing instead on “the big picture.”
Likewise, Rice has downplayed the relevance of Israel’s Phase
I obligations in light of the prospect of concluding Phase III negotiations.
While Secretary of
State Rice insists that “there is still time” for negotiations to bear fruit
and that the parties “will keep working for that goal,” the White House does
not share her optimism. U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor Elliott
Abrams, who handles Middle East issues, reportedly
told a group of American Jewish leaders recently that the ongoing negotiations
were a waste of time. Any agreement
reached between Livni and Qurei, he argued, would only be a personal agreement
between the two of them and not between Israel and the Palestinian
Authority.
The State Department and White House under President Bush have been at
odds over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since before the Annapolis
process started, so Rice has been left to push things forward on her on by
repeatedly visiting the region and inviting the parties to Washington.
Despite his pledge at Annapolis,
President Bush himself has been noticeably absent from the process since his May
visit to the Middle East. With turmoil in the Israeli political system,
continuing Israeli settlement expansion undermining credibility of the
Palestinian Authority and the absence of U.S. presidential leadership to unify
his own administration, it appears that the only one left expecting a deal by
the end of the year is Rice and her own State Department.
|