aic_header_logo
Home
Interference Is a Duty, but Implementation of Human Rights by the International Community Must Not Be Selective Print E-mail
Written by Michael Warschawski, Alternative Information Center (AIC)   
Wednesday, 11 June 2008
Tag it:
Delicious
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Digg
bernard_kouchner.jpg
Bernard Kouchner, French Minister of Foreign Affairs, called on France to establish a special body to investigate and eventually prosecute international war crimes, crimes against humanity, etc.

According to Le Monde (26 May 2008), the French Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bernard Kouchner, suggested that France establish a special body to investigate and eventually prosecute international war crimes, crimes against humanity, etc. Unlike Belgium, for example, French law doesn’t include “universal competence” and French courts can judge only crimes that are either committed in France or if the victims are French. 

The concept of “universal competence” assumes that the whole international community bears responsibility for war crimes and crimes against humanity, and no state can claim “it is none of my business, it was committed elsewhere.” One of the lessons from the Fascist barbarism is the mutual responsibility of the Human community in protecting basic human rights over the whole planet. These rights were formalized during the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Conventions and a long series of United Nations resolutions that gradually extended the concepts of Right and rights to a growing number of communities (women, national minorities, cultural minorities, children, etc.). 

One can claim that most of these rights remained on the paper, and were not seriously implemented by the community of nations. However, the very fact that these rights have been formally stated is not without significance: a society with norms of behavior—even when they are not implemented—is what distinguishes the beginning of civilization from the jungle, for in the jungle it is only might that makes right, though we will be able to claim that we live in a truly civilized human society only when these rights are universally put into practice and not merely normative declarations.

In the last two decades, the US neoconservatives have been trying to close the post-fascist era, and to cancel the normative framework elaborated as a reaction to Fascism. Under the pretext of “defending civilization from international terrorism,” they attempt to make the war policies of the Empire free from any limits based on respect for Human Rights.

No doubt, the suggestion of the founder of Physicians without Borders, who is now working for the ultra-conservative French President Nicolas Sarkozy, is a positive step. On one very important condition: that the implementation of Human Rights by the international community will not be selective, and address only those nations that will be declared “non-democratic” by a select club of states.

The investigation of states and their eventual prosecution should be the prerogative of an independent international tribunal, established by the United Nations General Assembly, and not by a coalition of self-appointed states that will decide a-priori who is violating the law and who is not.

The good faith of Bernard Kouchner can be easily tested: the International Tribunal of The Hague has ruled the illegality of the Apartheid Wall built by the Israel government, and has made a series of practical recommendations, starting with its dismantling and the payment of compensation for damages made up to the present. The United Nations General Assembly has endorsed these recommendations. If the French Foreign Ministry is sincere in its will to enforce international law over the planet, he should initiate an international effort to force Israel to implement the Hague ruling. As a first step, France should demand the suspension of all the economic and trade privileges that Israel is getting from its association with the European Union, until it will implement the decisions of the International Tribunal. It is a matter of common sense, but above all, a way to say loudly and clearly that our world is not a jungle where might is right, but a civilized framework where a blatant violation of the Right is punished.

Frankly, I doubt that Nicolas Sarkozy’s Foreign Minister will make even one small step in that direction.


 
< Prev   Next >
website statistics