|
Saturday, 3
November, our friend Danny Amit passed away. I last
met him, a couple of months ago in Bil’in, where we were celebrating the victory of the
village residents and the solidarity movement at the Israeli Supreme Court.
On the way
to the fence, we walked together and exchanged some thoughts on the situation
of the anti-occupation movement compared to what it was in the beginning of the
1980s, a quarter of a century ago, when, together with few others, Danny
established the first united movement against the occupation, the Israeli
Committee for Solidarity with Bir Zeit
University.
The Bir Zeit Committee, as we used to
call him, was the organizational tool through which the issue of occupation and
repression in the West Bank and Gaza
stopped being the preoccupation of the non-Zionist Left only, and penetrated
the mainstream of the Israeli society. I doubt very much that this Committee
could have kept its existence and ability to unite thousands of Israelis in
action without the central contribution of Danny Amit.
Armed with
a thorough knowledge of Israeli society, Danny was among the first to
understand that the defeat of the Labor Party, after many decades of absolute
hegemony on the Israeli political arena, was paving the way for the emergence
of a movement against occupation that could include new and less radical
sectors than in the previous decade. The great challenge he was facing was: how
to integrate into action three political sensibilities that had never really
worked together politically: the Communists, who were the only ones to be able
to mobilize substantial numbers of activists (due to their influence in the
Palestinian community of Israel); the radical anti-Zionists, who were the most
dedicated activists and had long-standing connections among the Palestinian
activists; and the new radicalizing sectors among “Left-Zionists.” As Danny once said: “we need the Communists for the quantity, the
anti-Zionists for their activism and the Zionist-Left for the legitimacy.”
And no one but him could link them together, making good use of the deep
respect and esteem he got from everyone.
While
walking in Bil’in and chatting, Danny was not looking
at the past with regret, as many previous-war veterans are sometimes tempted.
On the contrary, he was expressing a strong satisfaction that a new generation
of activists has taken the baton, and, in its own way, created a frame of
struggle better adapted to the 21st century’s needs. His premature
death leaves this new generation without a valuable teacher, who never behaved
as a teacher but as a respectful adviser and a comrade. As for the older
generation, we lost not only a companion, but also a real friend.
|